Hi, I need Naveen Gupta to do this assignment since he did the previous one… Thanks.this is the questions needed for the Case:Case Questions: 1. How valid was Kenneth Davis’ information about Ronald Maak’s taking $600,000 in testing equipment and $400,000 in cash from EXI? 2.Was Kenneth Davis’ strategy of “dragging out” the lawsuit involving EXI and Willitrent an ethical approach? Was it legal? 3. Was Kenneth Davis’ approach in transferring the assets of EXI to EXI West immediately after the trial an ethical approach? Was it legal? 4. Judge Rawlings ordered Ronald Maak and Kenneth Davis to develop a settlement for their lawsuit. Both individuals reached an agreement on a total settlement of $4 million payable by Kenneth Davis to Ronald Maak for punitive damages. Explain your reaction to this settlement. What is the significance, if any, for the settlement payment be classified as a punitive damage? 5. Using Case “B” as a reference, how ethical has Kenneth Davis been in his dealings with Ronald Maak? Explain. 6. Using Case “B” as a reference, how ethical has Ronald Maak been in his dealings with Kenneth Davis? Explain.attached case studyalso attached the previous answer Naveen Gupta gave me
Stop worrying about assignment deadlines, let us help with this paper!
Smart students don’t copy paste information from all over the web hoping to get a good grade! Watch the video below to learn what they do: